Why Is Marco Rubio Working With Democrats To Weaken Due Process On College Campuses?

Since I’m no longer a Republican, I’m not in a position to vote for or against Marco Rubio’s nomination to the presidency…but if I were, this would be yet another reason to pick another candidate (as if his vote on amnesty for illegals wasn’t bad enough):

Why Is Marco Rubio Working With Democrats To Weaken Due Process On College Campuses?

Quoting National Review:

For more than four years, the White House and the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) have used an implausible reinterpretation of a 1972 civil-rights law to impose mandates unimagined by the law’s sponsors. It has forced almost all of the nation’s universities and colleges to disregard due process in disciplinary proceedings when they involve allegations of sexual assault. Enforced by officials far outside the mainstream, these mandates are having a devastating impact on the nation’s universities and on the lives of dozens — almost certainly soon to be hundreds or thousands — of falsely accused students.

One might have expected an aggressive response by House Republicans to such gross abuses of power — including subpoenas, tough oversight hearings, and corrective legislation. Instead, most of them have been mute. In the Senate, meanwhile, presidential candidate Marco Rubio of Florida, Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley of Iowa, and rising star Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire have teamed with [Democrat] demagogues Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Claire McCaskill of Missouri in co-sponsoring a bill that would make matters even worse.

[…]

With key Republicans along for the ride, McCaskill and Gillibrand produced a bill designed to advance the administration’s agenda. Its language presumes the guilt of all students accused of sexual assault by repeatedly calling accusers who have not yet substantiated their claims “victims,” without the critical qualifier “alleged.” CASA would also order colleges to provide a “confidential advisor” for these “victims,” with no comparable help for the accused. And it would require universities to publish data on the outcomes of their campus sexual-assault cases (which only Yale does now), apparently in the hope that doing so will invite Title IX complaints against any college that finds an insufficient number of accused students guilty.

What’s going on in Oregon?

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”

— Declaration of Independence

Read this and get informed.  How other than “a long train of abuses and usurpations” would you describe federal actions going back more than a century?

Patriot Militia Seizes Federal Complex in Oregon; Armed Insurrection Against federal Tyranny Begins

 

Canadian News Anchor Gives Warning To American Gun Owners

Registration leads to confiscation. The video explains how it happened in Canada. Don’t make the mistake of thinking it couldn’t happen here. Yes, we have a Second Amendment that says otherwise, but the regime in Washington treats the Constitution like so much toilet paper. 0bama’s pen and phone are not stronger than your gun, but it is up to you to make that point to him and his lawless henchmen.

Will no one rid us of this meddlesome traitor?

Report: Obama To Campaign Overseas Against Donald Trump

The headline and what it describes aren’t even the worst of it:

The plan to integrate foreign opinion into the 2016 election complements Obama’s view of immigrants as part of the progressives’ domestic political coalition, and his view that America’s power can be used as a political battering-ram for progressives’ worldwide political ambitions.

For example, in 2014, he argued that Americans do not have the right to choose who can migrate into the United States. In November 2014, Obama declared that “there have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans.”

Dafuq?  If we don’t decide who gets to come here, who does?  What is a country without borders?  Not a country.

But wait…there’s more:

Obama and his fellow progressives also see foreign immigrants in the United States as better than Americans, in part, because they’re more likely to vote for progressive policies.“I’m proud to be among the first to greet you as ‘My fellow Americans’… We can never say it often or loudly enough: Immigrants and refugees revitalize and renew America,” Obama claimed at a Dec. 15 naturalization event in D.C. He also urged the immigrants to get behind his political agenda.

Lee Harvey Oswald, where are you now that we need you?

Yes, I’m going there, and if you don’t like it, you can keep 0bama company in hell.  That treasonous son of a bitch has destroyed my country (that’s what he really meant by “fundamental transformation”).  He’s playing with forces his coke-addled peabrain cannot comprehend, and is practically daring patriots to declare a second civil war.  I might have been content to merely see him impeached and removed from office, or for him to just go away at some point, but the spineless wimps in the Republican party won’t impeach him and he’s too much of a malignant narcissist to just go away.  Nothing would please me more than to see his lifeless carcass swinging from the nearest lamppost as a warning to others who would take us down the same road.